DK
Dermatologie am KlosterwallDr. med. K. Hartmann20/05/2026
scan composite · 7 zones
Isemeco · 3D mesh

Report · Anna Sample

Your skin in numbers.

Overall skin score
72/ 100
How is this calculated?

Overall skin score as weighted average.

The overall skin score is the mean of all five axes of your profile radar. Each axis comes from an independent scanner measurement. The scale runs from 0 (notable) to 100 (optimal).
Wrinkles
67 / 100
Pores
94 / 100
Pigment
79 / 100
Redness
29 / 100
Hydration
38 / 100
Skin age estimate
45.2years
2.8 years younger than your chronological age.

Overall balanced. Pores sit clearly above average. Hydration and redness are below the typical mean and carry the tension in this report.

Before · After

What has changed since the last scan.

Direct comparison with your previous scan at this practice. Higher means better, per axis with delta and mini trend bar.

72/100
6

Letzter Scan

66 · 18 Feb 2026

Scans gesamt

2

Change analysis

Compared with the previous scan the overall score is up 6 points. Hydration and wrinkles improve most, while the redness score dipped slightly. Discuss the development at your next appointment.

Wrinkles

+6
67vorher 61

Pores

+4
94vorher 90

Pigment

± 0
79vorher 79

Redness

-6
29vorher 35

Hydration

+7
38vorher 31

Chapter 01 · Your narrative

A calm, well-cared-for surface.

The scan reads like carefully handled paper. Pore structure at 94 sits far above the 64 average, UV markers stay low at 90. Hydration drops to 38 and redness to 29, both carry the tension in this report.

Chapter 02 · Your profile

Five axes, one picture.

Each axis measures an independent skin quality. Higher is better. Values between 60 and 80 are within the expected range. Outliers in either direction deserve attention.

WRINKLES67PORES94PIGMENT79REDNESS29HYDRATION38

Chapter 03 · How we captured it

What we see that you don't.

Four captures from light spectra your eye doesn't directly see: UV light reveals bacterial porphyrins (glowing red) and sun damage beneath the skin, heatmaps make pigment distribution and redness zones visible. Polarised wrinkle and pore analyses follow as their own chapters below.

Overview · RGB
Porphyrins · UV
Pigment · UV
Pigment · brown
Redness
Polarised

Chapter 04 · Strengths

What stands out particularly well.

Pore score 94 sits well above the 64 average, with a fine distribution of mostly small and medium openings. UV markers stay low at 90, suggesting careful sun exposure. The brown-spot score of 84 confirms a calm, even surface pigment.

Pores

Pore structure fine and even.

The polarised capture is the raw image the algorithm counts from. The 4,081 pores split into mostly small and medium openings with only 352 large ones.

Skin score
94/ 100
Measured value
4,081 pores, 352 large, 2,224 medium
You · Ø · OptimalScale 0 to 100
You 94Ø 64Optimal 92

Pore size distribution

  • Klein

    1.505 · 37 %

  • Mittel

    2.224 · 54 %

  • Groß

    352 · 9 %

UV markers

Low UV history. Sun protection has paid off.

UV markers sit beneath the surface and only become visible under UV light. A low marker count points to careful sun exposure or consistent SPF use.

Skin score
90/ 100
Measured value
38 sub-surface markers
You · Ø · OptimalScale 0 to 100
You 90Ø 58Optimal 90

Porphyrins

Few bacterial porphyrins. Acne activity stays low.

Under UV light, bacterial porphyrin metabolites glow red on the lip border, the wings of the nose and across the forehead. Low counts read as low active inflammation.

Skin score
88/ 100
Measured value
14 markers, lip border + nose
You · Ø · OptimalScale 0 to 100
You 88Ø 60Optimal 90

Brown spots

Surface pigment is calm and even.

Discrete brown spots show as sepia edges on the heat map. A score in the eighties signals a stable, uniform pigment surface.

Skin score
84/ 100
Measured value
142 discrete spots
You · Ø · OptimalScale 0 to 100
You 84Ø 62Optimal 92

Chapter 05 · Signals

Where the report carries tension.

Hydration stands at 38 and redness at 29, both below the typical midpoint. The 702 redness areas are localised rather than face-wide, alongside a wrinkle map with a clear forehead concentration (forehead 26, glabella 34) against a weighted wrinkle average of 67.

Redness

Redness is distributed rather than localised. The pattern is worth a closer look.

The redness heatmap surfaces 702 small red areas across the face. Distributed patterns often respond to skincare changes, climate or seasonal triggers.

Skin score
29/ 100
Measured value
702 red areas, distributed
You · Ø · OptimalScale 0 to 100
You 29Ø 66Optimal 90

Hydration

The skin barrier is operating within the normal range.

Hydration is derived from the other measurements. A direct moisture measurement is expected in an upcoming device generation.

Skin score
38/ 100
Measured value
Derived from the other values
You · Ø · OptimalScale 0 to 100
You 38Ø 65Optimal 88

Surface pigment

Surface pigment density sits slightly above the typical mid-range.

The rainbow heatmap shows pigment density across the face. Surface pigment is the same brown-pigment data as the spot count, rendered as a density map rather than discrete points.

Skin score
78/ 100
Measured value
218 markers, density map
You · Ø · OptimalScale 0 to 100
You 78Ø 64Optimal 90

Chapter 06 · Wrinkles in detail

Wrinkle analysis in detail.

Seven individual facial regions are measured separately by the scanner. For each region we record wrinkle depth (skin texture, light, mid, deep) as an area in square millimetres.

Region 01
isemeco · 3d

Forehead

Forehead lines run horizontally with the frontalis muscle activation.

Skin score
26/ 100
Wrinkle stage
3
Depth distributionTotal 6.39 cm²
  • Skin texture

    51 % · 3.28 cm²

  • Light

    26 % · 1.69 cm²

  • Mid

    16 % · 1.04 cm²

  • Deep

    6 % · 38 mm²

Region 02
isemeco · 3d

Glabella

Vertical lines between the brows form during corrugator activation.

Skin score
34/ 100
Wrinkle stage
2
Depth distributionTotal 4.25 cm²
  • Skin texture

    53 % · 2.25 cm²

  • Light

    30 % · 1.28 cm²

  • Mid

    14 % · 58 mm²

  • Deep

    3 % · 14 mm²

Region 03
isemeco · 3d

Crow's feet

Periorbital lines result from orbicularis oculi activity during smiling and squinting.

Skin score
72/ 100
Wrinkle stage
1
Depth distributionTotal 2.61 cm²
  • Skin texture

    68 % · 1.76 cm²

  • Light

    23 % · 61 mm²

  • Mid

    8 % · 20 mm²

  • Deep

    1 % · 4 mm²

Region 04
isemeco · 3d

Under-eye

Thin skin under the eyes shows fluid changes and fine surface texture.

Skin score
80/ 100
Wrinkle stage
1
Depth distributionTotal 2.57 cm²
  • Skin texture

    78 % · 2.02 cm²

  • Light

    17 % · 43 mm²

  • Mid

    4 % · 11 mm²

  • Deep

    1 % · 2 mm²

Region 05
isemeco · 3d

Nasolabial

Folds running from the nose to the corners of the mouth deepen with age and volume loss.

Skin score
64/ 100
Wrinkle stage
2
Depth distributionTotal 4.37 cm²
  • Skin texture

    60 % · 2.63 cm²

  • Light

    28 % · 1.22 cm²

  • Mid

    10 % · 43 mm²

  • Deep

    2 % · 9 mm²

Region 06
isemeco · 3d

Mouth corners

Marionette lines below the mouth corners deepen with downward muscle pull.

Skin score
76/ 100
Wrinkle stage
1
Depth distributionTotal 2.05 cm²
  • Skin texture

    67 % · 1.37 cm²

  • Light

    25 % · 52 mm²

  • Mid

    7 % · 14 mm²

  • Deep

    1 % · 2 mm²

Region 07
isemeco · 3d

Between eyes

Small bridge lines mirror the glabella pattern at lower intensity.

Skin score
68/ 100
Wrinkle stage
1
Depth distributionTotal 1.47 cm²
  • Skin texture

    71 % · 1.04 cm²

  • Light

    23 % · 34 mm²

  • Mid

    5 % · 7 mm²

  • Deep

    1 % · 1 mm²

Chapter 07 · The pattern

What the values together say.

The combination is worth a closer look. Fine pore structure at 94 alongside broad redness at 29: a structurally tidy surface that runs reactive on top. Forehead wrinkles at 26 sit notably below the rest of the wrinkle map at 67, a localised concentration rather than a face-wide picture.

Chapter 08 · Your next conversation

What to surface at the next visit.

Two items for the practice conversation. First, the redness distribution at 29 with 702 red areas, whether seasonal, product-related, or part of a longer pattern. Second, the localised forehead and glabella values (26 and 34), both well below the weighted wrinkle average of 67, worth a closer look at the dynamic involved.

This narrative was generated with AI from your measurement data. It is a structured summary of your values, not a medical diagnosis nor a treatment recommendation. A clinical assessment is provided by your practice.

Ask about your report

What would you like to know?

Ask a question about your specific values. Answers always refer to your measurement data and are not medical advice.

These answers are AI-generated and refer only to the measurement values shown here. They do not replace a clinical conversation. For acute concerns, please contact your practice or an emergency service directly.

Chapter 09 · What comes next

This report doesn't replace a conversation. It prepares one.

Dermatologie am Klosterwall knows your history and can put these values in context. Book an appointment to discuss any standout areas, or save the report for later.

Contact person
Dr. med. Katrin Hartmann
Email
termin@klosterwall-derma.de
Phone
+49 174 1569641

Measurement details

Scanner

Isemeco D8

20230307D08A1568

Algorithm

4.2.1

3D 1.6.3

Resolution

18.00 µm² / Pixel

Pixel-to-area

Capture time

20/05/2026, 10:30

Recorded at the device

Full audit trail